With a ‘formidable reputation in the education law field’, 11KBW cover the full range of education law issues and education disputes and is home to barristers who lead in some of the most high-profile education cases. Jonathan Auburn KC appeared for the school and local authority in the inquest into the death of Ruth Perry, a headteacher took her own life following a critical Ofsted report. Aileen McColgan KC continued to represent the University of Bristol in an appeal on the judge’s finding that the university had not breached a duty of care brought by the family of a student who took her own life. Tom Cross was junior counsel for the school in R (TTT) v Michaela School, in which he defeated a challenge by a Muslim pupil regarding the prayer ritual ban imposed by the school, which was alleged to have violated her Article 9 rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. With significant experience in the higher education sector, Katherine Eddy regularly acts in high profile and sensitive discrimination challenges brought by students and academics against universities.
Education in
London Bar
11KBW
Les références
‘The clerks at 11KBW are always very responsive. Michael Smith in particular is very good at building rapport with instructing solicitors and provides a first class service.’
’11KBW has a formidable reputation in the education law field.’
‘A top notch set with a strong set of juniors.’
Principaux dossiers
Matrix Chambers
Barristers at Matrix Chambers are known for their excellent handling of education law matters for an array of clients, including individual students or parents, as well as the Department of Education and a variety of statutory bodies. David Wolfe KC and Katy Sheridan acted for the claimants in R (Bowen) v Kent County Council, challenging the decision of Kent County Council to refuse to consider a humanist for membership of local authority Standing Advisory Councils on Religious Education. Claire Darwin KC represented the Department of Education in a judicial review against admission arrangements, including the nomination of a primary school as a feeder school, for Langley Park School for Boys and Langley Park School for Girls for the September 2023 intake were challenged as unfair. Nick Armstrong KC is lauded for being ‘particularly good at difficult cross-examination in the context of the girst-tier tribunal, knowing exactly when and to what extent to ask the difficult questions, whilst displaying a sense of empathy’.
Les références
‘Matrix is a go to set with an exceptional team of education law counsel with a wide variety of knowledge and experience.’
‘Very good for higher education and equality matters, matters relating to students, freedom of expression – good sector knowledge: invaluable.’
‘Brilliant set. One of the best in the market place.’
Principaux dossiers
39 Essex Chambers
39 Essex Chambers is well-known in education law for its expertise spanning the education sector, from judicial reviews, appeals to the first-tier tribunal and upper tribunal, exclusions and admissions appeals, educational negligence claims, education prosecutions, discrimination and human rights matters, to contractual disputes and employment claims. Steve Broach KC is praised for his ‘second-to-none expertise in relation to all things disability and education’. Rory Dunlop KC appears on behalf of the claimants in SC v Kingston Grammar School, a disability discrimination claim, questioning the rights of schools to remove a child because of their parent’s conduct. Rachel Sullivan acted as junior counsel in R (Sharp) v Office of the School Adjudicator, relating the OSA’s functions when considering complaints about school admissions arrangements.
Les références
‘Steve has second-to-none expertise in relation to all things disability and education. He’s tenacious and creative, and a fantastic advocate. Very clear. Able to distil complex issues into compelling submissions.’
’39 Essex Chambers have a variety of members who all have knowledge and expertise in a variety of areas of law that I work in and I know they can always provide me with appropriate Counsel to assist.’
‘This is one of the strongest chambers for public law and education work. They have a huge selection of barristers who are all known to be excellent, and a supportive and collaborative working environment.’
Principaux dossiers
3PB
3PB’s barristers cover the complete range of education disputes, including acting in tribunal claims and judicial reviews related to SEND matters, discrimination, pupil disciplinary and school exclusion, as well as academic and disciplinary decisions in schools and universities.Matthew Wyard is noted for his expertise in judicial reviews and in special educational needs matters. Alice de Coverley has been active in Upper Tribunal appeals and First-tier Tribunals related to education, health and care plans and disability discrimination.
Les références
‘Specialist set for SEND Tribunal work.’
‘3PB as a set is well known for its education work.’
‘3PB are one of (if not the) go-to sets for education law. We regularly instruct the set and are always impressed at the quality and consistency of their work, both in terms of written drafting and their advocacy. They are a pleasure to instruct.’
Principaux dossiers
11KBW
Les références
‘The clerks at 11KBW are always very responsive. Michael Smith in particular is very good at building rapport with instructing solicitors and provides a first class service.’
’11KBW has a formidable reputation in the education law field.’
‘A top notch set with a strong set of juniors.’
Principaux dossiers
Matrix Chambers
Barristers at Matrix Chambers are known for their excellent handling of education law matters for an array of clients, including individual students or parents, as well as the Department of Education and a variety of statutory bodies. David Wolfe KC and Katy Sheridan acted for the claimants in R (Bowen) v Kent County Council, challenging the decision of Kent County Council to refuse to consider a humanist for membership of local authority Standing Advisory Councils on Religious Education. Claire Darwin KC represented the Department of Education in a judicial review against admission arrangements, including the nomination of a primary school as a feeder school, for Langley Park School for Boys and Langley Park School for Girls for the September 2023 intake were challenged as unfair. Nick Armstrong KC is lauded for being ‘particularly good at difficult cross-examination in the context of the girst-tier tribunal, knowing exactly when and to what extent to ask the difficult questions, whilst displaying a sense of empathy’.
Les références
‘Matrix is a go to set with an exceptional team of education law counsel with a wide variety of knowledge and experience.’
‘Very good for higher education and equality matters, matters relating to students, freedom of expression – good sector knowledge: invaluable.’
‘Brilliant set. One of the best in the market place.’
Principaux dossiers
39 Essex Chambers
39 Essex Chambers is well-known in education law for its expertise spanning the education sector, from judicial reviews, appeals to the first-tier tribunal and upper tribunal, exclusions and admissions appeals, educational negligence claims, education prosecutions, discrimination and human rights matters, to contractual disputes and employment claims. Steve Broach KC is praised for his ‘second-to-none expertise in relation to all things disability and education’. Rory Dunlop KC appears on behalf of the claimants in SC v Kingston Grammar School, a disability discrimination claim, questioning the rights of schools to remove a child because of their parent’s conduct. Rachel Sullivan acted as junior counsel in R (Sharp) v Office of the School Adjudicator, relating the OSA’s functions when considering complaints about school admissions arrangements.
Les références
‘Steve has second-to-none expertise in relation to all things disability and education. He’s tenacious and creative, and a fantastic advocate. Very clear. Able to distil complex issues into compelling submissions.’
’39 Essex Chambers have a variety of members who all have knowledge and expertise in a variety of areas of law that I work in and I know they can always provide me with appropriate Counsel to assist.’
‘This is one of the strongest chambers for public law and education work. They have a huge selection of barristers who are all known to be excellent, and a supportive and collaborative working environment.’
Principaux dossiers
3PB
3PB’s barristers cover the complete range of education disputes, including acting in tribunal claims and judicial reviews related to SEND matters, discrimination, pupil disciplinary and school exclusion, as well as academic and disciplinary decisions in schools and universities.Matthew Wyard is noted for his expertise in judicial reviews and in special educational needs matters. Alice de Coverley has been active in Upper Tribunal appeals and First-tier Tribunals related to education, health and care plans and disability discrimination.
Les références
‘Specialist set for SEND Tribunal work.’
‘3PB as a set is well known for its education work.’
‘3PB are one of (if not the) go-to sets for education law. We regularly instruct the set and are always impressed at the quality and consistency of their work, both in terms of written drafting and their advocacy. They are a pleasure to instruct.’