Monckton Chambers routinely acts for both the taxpayer and HMRC with extensive experience in VAT and other indirect taxes. Melanie Hall KC is well-regarded for her expertise in domestic VAT issues and offshore membership of UK VAT groups. Valentina Sloane KC has continued to represent Bolt, in the case of Bolt v HMRC, which has now been heard in the Upper Tribunal - a test-case as far as the application of VAT to ride-hailing in the UK. Brendan McGurk KC advises Friends of the Earth in a dispute with HMRC as to if its charitable division's financial contributions to its campaigning arm are a non-taxable grant or a taxable supply of services.
Tax: VAT and excise in
London Bar
Monckton Chambers
Les références
‘Monckton is a market leader in this field.’
‘Monckton Chambers is a fantastic set.’
Principaux dossiers
1 Crown Office Row
Acting for both the taxpayer and HMRC, 1 Crown Office Row is well regarded for its handling of judicial reviews involving public law challenges concerning aspects of tax administration. Owain Thomas KC represents HMRC and taxpayers in wide range of indirect tax matters such as VAT, customs duties, and landfill tax. . Natasha Barnes advised a potential claimant on a proposed judicial review of the introduction of VAT on independent school fees, while. Edward Waldegrave appeared in Barclays Services Corporation v HMRC, a case on VAT grouping in the financial services sector. Laura Inglis joined from Gray's Inn Tax Chambers.
Les références
‘1 Crown Office Row is a very professional chambers. The clerks are helpful and responsive, and ensure any requests are dealt with efficiently. Other barristers and KCs at this chambers are also of a very high calibre.’
‘This Chambers has built up a strong reputation for VAT specialist counsel and is often instructed by both HMRC and private clients.’
‘Great strength in depth and masters of a broad range of public matters.’
Principaux dossiers
Blackstone Chambers
A number of the members of Blackstone Chambers have experience at various levels of the court with indirect tax. Sam Grodzinski KC frequently acts in VAT cases both for and against HMRC, while Kieron Beal KC is instructed on judicial review challenges and appeals for taxpayers and HMRC, notably acting on behalf of the taxpayer in Boehringer v HMRC, a case concerning the rebates made to the Department for Health and Social Care under the pharmaceutical schemes operating for NHS medicines.
Les références
‘Excellent chambers.’
Principaux dossiers
Devereux
The members of Devereux appear before all levels of the courts and in judicial reviews, offering a varied indirect tax practice with notable matters regarding VAT. Rebecca Murray appeared as sole counsel in Oculus v HMRC, a strike out application against a Maltese company which made the argument that EU law required the FTT to hear the case, while Max Schofield represented the claimants in DuelFuel Nutrition v HMRC, concerning the application of VAT to products marketed as sports flapjacks and brownies.
Les références
‘Superbly supportive clerking team. The leading set for taxpayers that are found in disputes involving VAT, employment taxes, and tax fraud’
‘Devereaux has the best tax disputes team in the Temple by some margin, and when you engage them, you engage the team. The clerks are superbly receptive and go out of their way to find solutions.’
‘This set is very strong in tax and has a good reputation for a number of different taxes.’
Principaux dossiers
GRAY'S INN TAX CHAMBERS
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers assists both taxpayers and HMRC, providing advice representation before tribunals and courts. Nicola Shaw KC led Sam Brodsky in The Tower One St George Wharf Limited v Revenue and Customs, a case concerning group relief claims. Michael Firth KC led Harry Winter before the Supreme Court in Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v HMRC, a case on the VAT treatment of hospital car parking charges.
Les références
The clerking team is superb. Ben Stern and Jamie Hall are quick to respond to requests, unfailingly courteous and polite, and a pleasure to deal with.’
‘Ben Stern, Senior Clerk, is excellent. Very responsive and accommodating.’
‘A technically very good set.’
Principaux dossiers
Pump Court Tax Chambers
Providing both advice and advocacy in contentious matters, Pump Court Tax Chambers covers a wide range of indirect tax issues including VAT issues relating to school fees, health care tax exemptions and input tax recovery. Andrew Hitchmough KC has led 2025 silk, Laura Poots KC, in JP Morgan Chase Bank v HMRC, a case concerning the finance exemption as applied to investment banks. Kevin Prosser KC led Quinlan Windle in Wakefield College v HMRC, a case determining if the construction costs of a new college on the basis that it would be used for purposes of a "business". Rupert Baldry KC appeared before the Court of Appeal in Jazztel v HMRC, a test concerning a number of companies who had paid stamp duty reserve tax contrary to EU law. Zizhen Yang is instructed by a recycling company in a case concerning the application of landfill tax to a "valley feature" - required by regulation - sited above a geographical fault, at issue is if a material is disposed "with the intention to discard it".
Les références
‘The clerks are always helpful and available. Mark Rushton is very professional. John Poyser is hugely experienced.’
‘Clerks are very responsive. Luke Sawyer in particular is very helpful.’
‘The clerks are very responsive and very personable.’
Principaux dossiers
Temple Tax Chambers
Temple Tax Chambers is well regarded for its provision of advice and representation on indirect tax. Tim Brown possesses ‘excellent indirect tax knowledge’, having acted for the taxpayer on Innovative Bites Ltd v Revenue & Customs, an appeal concerning the VAT treatment of extra-large marshmallows. Denis Edwards appeared before the Upper Tribunal in R (Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust) v HMRC, a VAT judicial review claim concerning whether supplies made to local authorities of public health services, were business activities or made by the NHS Trust pursuant to a special legal regime.
Principaux dossiers
Monckton Chambers
Les références
‘Monckton is a market leader in this field.’
‘Monckton Chambers is a fantastic set.’
Principaux dossiers
1 Crown Office Row
Acting for both the taxpayer and HMRC, 1 Crown Office Row is well regarded for its handling of judicial reviews involving public law challenges concerning aspects of tax administration. Owain Thomas KC represents HMRC and taxpayers in wide range of indirect tax matters such as VAT, customs duties, and landfill tax. . Natasha Barnes advised a potential claimant on a proposed judicial review of the introduction of VAT on independent school fees, while. Edward Waldegrave appeared in Barclays Services Corporation v HMRC, a case on VAT grouping in the financial services sector. Laura Inglis joined from Gray's Inn Tax Chambers.
Les références
‘1 Crown Office Row is a very professional chambers. The clerks are helpful and responsive, and ensure any requests are dealt with efficiently. Other barristers and KCs at this chambers are also of a very high calibre.’
‘This Chambers has built up a strong reputation for VAT specialist counsel and is often instructed by both HMRC and private clients.’
‘Great strength in depth and masters of a broad range of public matters.’
Principaux dossiers
Blackstone Chambers
A number of the members of Blackstone Chambers have experience at various levels of the court with indirect tax. Sam Grodzinski KC frequently acts in VAT cases both for and against HMRC, while Kieron Beal KC is instructed on judicial review challenges and appeals for taxpayers and HMRC, notably acting on behalf of the taxpayer in Boehringer v HMRC, a case concerning the rebates made to the Department for Health and Social Care under the pharmaceutical schemes operating for NHS medicines.
Les références
‘Excellent chambers.’
Principaux dossiers
Devereux
The members of Devereux appear before all levels of the courts and in judicial reviews, offering a varied indirect tax practice with notable matters regarding VAT. Rebecca Murray appeared as sole counsel in Oculus v HMRC, a strike out application against a Maltese company which made the argument that EU law required the FTT to hear the case, while Max Schofield represented the claimants in DuelFuel Nutrition v HMRC, concerning the application of VAT to products marketed as sports flapjacks and brownies.
Les références
‘Superbly supportive clerking team. The leading set for taxpayers that are found in disputes involving VAT, employment taxes, and tax fraud’
‘Devereaux has the best tax disputes team in the Temple by some margin, and when you engage them, you engage the team. The clerks are superbly receptive and go out of their way to find solutions.’
‘This set is very strong in tax and has a good reputation for a number of different taxes.’
Principaux dossiers
GRAY'S INN TAX CHAMBERS
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers assists both taxpayers and HMRC, providing advice representation before tribunals and courts. Nicola Shaw KC led Sam Brodsky in The Tower One St George Wharf Limited v Revenue and Customs, a case concerning group relief claims. Michael Firth KC led Harry Winter before the Supreme Court in Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v HMRC, a case on the VAT treatment of hospital car parking charges.
Les références
The clerking team is superb. Ben Stern and Jamie Hall are quick to respond to requests, unfailingly courteous and polite, and a pleasure to deal with.’
‘Ben Stern, Senior Clerk, is excellent. Very responsive and accommodating.’
‘A technically very good set.’
Principaux dossiers
Pump Court Tax Chambers
Providing both advice and advocacy in contentious matters, Pump Court Tax Chambers covers a wide range of indirect tax issues including VAT issues relating to school fees, health care tax exemptions and input tax recovery. Andrew Hitchmough KC has led 2025 silk, Laura Poots KC, in JP Morgan Chase Bank v HMRC, a case concerning the finance exemption as applied to investment banks. Kevin Prosser KC led Quinlan Windle in Wakefield College v HMRC, a case determining if the construction costs of a new college on the basis that it would be used for purposes of a "business". Rupert Baldry KC appeared before the Court of Appeal in Jazztel v HMRC, a test concerning a number of companies who had paid stamp duty reserve tax contrary to EU law. Zizhen Yang is instructed by a recycling company in a case concerning the application of landfill tax to a "valley feature" - required by regulation - sited above a geographical fault, at issue is if a material is disposed "with the intention to discard it".
Les références
‘The clerks are always helpful and available. Mark Rushton is very professional. John Poyser is hugely experienced.’
‘Clerks are very responsive. Luke Sawyer in particular is very helpful.’
‘The clerks are very responsive and very personable.’
Principaux dossiers
Temple Tax Chambers
Temple Tax Chambers is well regarded for its provision of advice and representation on indirect tax. Tim Brown possesses ‘excellent indirect tax knowledge’, having acted for the taxpayer on Innovative Bites Ltd v Revenue & Customs, an appeal concerning the VAT treatment of extra-large marshmallows. Denis Edwards appeared before the Upper Tribunal in R (Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust) v HMRC, a VAT judicial review claim concerning whether supplies made to local authorities of public health services, were business activities or made by the NHS Trust pursuant to a special legal regime.