Considered a ‘powerhouse in the field of immigration and public law’, Garden Court Chambers has a longstanding reputation as the ‘go-to’ set for complex claimant immigration matters. The set has wide-ranging expertise spanning immigration detention, asylum and deportation, alongside business immigration capabilities, with barristers regularly appearing before the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights. Of note, several barristers are at the forefront of Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) cases, with Edward Grieves KC leading Emma Fitzsimons on P3 v SSHD, involving the deprivation of British nationality based on alleged connections to Iranian intelligence. Irena Sabic KC and Eva Doerr are recognised for their expertise in cases concerning the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement and EU Settlement Scheme, having acted in Vasa v SSHD before the Court of Appeal, which set a significant precedent regarding the admission of non-EEA family members to the UK under the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016. With notable expertise on the Afghanistan Relocation and Assistance Programme, Nicola Braganza KC led Maria Moodie on a significant case before the Court of Appeal, acting on behalf of a senior Supreme Court judge in Afghanistan prior to Taliban rule.
Immigration (including business immigration) in
London Bar
Garden Court Chambers
Les références
The clerking team at Garden Court is excellent. In particular, Lisa O’Leary stands out as consistently helpful, efficient, and accommodating. She ensures a smooth administrative experience and is always available to assist.
The clerks are excellent, Helen Louise D\’Agostino and Harriet Massie are particularly responsive and always able to assist.
‘The clerks at Garden Court are some of the most efficient and friendliest clerks I have had the pleasure of dealing with over the years.’
Principaux dossiers
39 Essex Chambers
The ‘strong multi-disciplinary’ team at 39 Essex Chambers is distinguished for its robust immigrations appeals and judicial review practice, with the set representing both claimants and the Home Office in ‘some of the leading cases’ before all levels of the courts. The highly regarded Lisa Giovannetti KC is noted for acting on behalf of the government in immigration test cases, with recent cases involving the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy, family reunion policy for refugee children and the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. Rory Dunlop KC successfully represented the Home Office in AM (Belarus) v SSHD before the Supreme Court, setting a new precedent regarding whether there may be a positive obligation under Article 8 ECHR to give lawful status to an illegal immigrant who has obstructed removal. Colin Thomann KC centres his practice upon new country guidance determinations and policy challenges, while Alan Payne KC recently acted for the Home Office defeating a challenge to Home Office policy on the allocation of accommodation to vulnerable asylum seekers.
Les références
‘Very experienced and knowledgeable in immigration.’
’39 Essex Chambers is a powerhouse in immigration.’
‘Clear, persuasive and strategic.’
Principaux dossiers
Blackstone Chambers
Praised as ‘the premier public law set’ for many, the immigration barristers at Blackstone Chambers continue to be involved in high-profile cases spanning public law, human rights and immigration law. Naina Patel KC has recently acted on behalf of Anti-Slavery International concerning the Home Office's imposition of Public Order Disqualification decisions on victims of trafficking with criminal convictions, while 2025 silk appointment Jason Pobjoy KC has a track record of refugee law work and academia including the Rwanda plan litigation.
Les références
‘Good organisation with responsive clerks.’
‘A user-friendly set that is willing to make things work.’
‘Blackstone are the premier public law set.’
Principaux dossiers
Doughty Street Chambers
Considered ‘leaders in the field of immigration and asylum law’, the barristers at Doughty Street Chambers are well-respected for their wide-ranging expertise in immigration, nationality, and asylum matters. The set routinely acts on behalf of individual claimants and NGOs including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), at all levels of the courts. Laura Dubinsky KC, supported by Agata Patyna and Alice Irving, led the UNHCR team in R (YXY) v SSHD, the second round of Rwanda litigation following the introduction of the Safety of Rwanda Act 2024. At present, Dubinsky, Patyna and Sarah Dobbie are representing 94 asylum seekers in civil claims for damages for false imprisonment following their detention at Manston House. David Lemer is noted for his expertise in national security cases before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, while Simon Cox is involved in significant test case challenges under the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement, including a judicial review concerning the rights of carers of British citizen children in relation to the EU Settlement Scheme.
Les références
‘Very approachable and helpful clerking team.’
‘I’ve only ever had positive experiences with Doughty Street Chambers. Their clerks are always really helpful and well-organised and their barristers are always well informed and hard working.’
‘The team have great expertise covering all areas of asylum, immigration and nationality law. They are one of the leading sets in this field. Their clerks are very responsive and proactive.’
Principaux dossiers
Landmark Chambers
Landmark Chambers ‘stands out for its depth of expertise in all aspects of public law’, with its immigration barristers acting on behalf of both the government and claimants at the tribunal, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court level. David Blundell KC recently acted on behalf of the Secretary of State in Begum v SSHD, a high-profile case concerning the relationship between national security and procedural fairness whereby the Court of Appeal ultimately dismissed the appeal of the 25-year old who left Bethnal Green to join Islamic State in Syria a decade ago. Julia Smyth KC, who was appointed King’s Counsel in 2025, has led on several prominent cases involving provisions within the Withdrawal Agreement, while Alex Goodman KC led the successful appeal in ASY and Others v SSHD, a case concerning damages for breaches of Article 3 ECHR for migrant mothers whose children were denied recourse to public funds. Tim Buley KC continues to act as lead Special Advocate in a number of cases under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy.
Les références
‘One of the best immigration chambers in the country.’
‘Landmark are a top set for public law and human rights which includes much immigration related litigation. They have a great stable of barristers and their clerking is extremely user friendly.’
‘Clear, knowledgeable, personable and well structured.’
Principaux dossiers
Matrix Chambers
Matrix Chambers has earned a ‘very good reputation’ in the field of immigration and asylum law, with its practitioners regularly acting in complex and novel cases involving high net worth individuals and national security issues. Nick Armstrong KC led Toby Fisher and Darryl Hutcheon in R (AH and IS) v SSHD, a significant challenge to individual immigration detentions that raised a wider systems challenge to the Home Office and Brook House immigration removal centre. Raza Husain KC is highly regarded for his work on the Rwanda litigation, having acted as lead counsel the litigation both prior and subsequent to the Safety of Rwanda Act 2024, up until the policy's demise at the end of the Conservative government. Christopher Buttler KC acted in VT v Commissioner for the British Indian Ocean Territory, a successful claim on behalf of 61 Tamil migrants seeking damages for their treatment in the British Overseas Territory with no population other than a joint US-UK military base. Eleanor Mitchell was also involved in key Diego Garcia-related litigation.
Les références
‘Matrix are really good. They, rightly, have a very good reputation and are very well known in our field.’
Principaux dossiers
One Pump Court
With ‘very experienced counsel at all levels able to cover every area of immigration law’, One Pump Court is particularly adept at handling cases involving gender-based persecution, trafficking, immigration detention and asylum claims based on sexual orientation and gender identity. David Chirico KC acted in SSHD v Kolicaj before the Court of Appeal, successfully representing an Albanian-British dual national following a Home Office decision to deprive him of his citizenship, whereby the court concluded that the Home Office’s approach was procedurally unfair. Emma Daykin is highlighted for her work in numerous cases involving the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy, including high-profile claims involving former members of the Afghan Special Forces units known as the ‘Triples’, whose applications for relocation were allegedly vetoed by the SAS. Other key practitioners in the set are Justine Fisher and Daniel Grutters, who both leverage extensive experience in immigration detention cases.
Les références
‘They have very experienced counsel at all levels able to cover every area of immigration law. I feel confident of instructing any barrister at these chambers.’
‘Easy to work with and collaborative.’
Principaux dossiers
Goldsmith Chambers
‘Known to be experts in the field of immigration, asylum and human rights’, the immigration barristers at Goldsmith Chambers represent clients in immigration law matters before all levels of the Courts and Tribunal system. The set has a robust reputation for cases concerning the Withdrawal Agreement, with Anthony Metzer KC leading Sanaz Saifolahi in GH v SSHD, a successful appeal whereby the Court of Appeal found passport stamps amounted to facilitation of residence for the purposes of the Agreement. Saifolahi also has experience in national security cases before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, while Charlotte Bayati is highly regarded for her work on gender and sexual violence issues.
Les références
‘The team are known to be experts in the field of immigration, asylum, and human rights, with a crossing into other areas of law.’
‘Very quick to respond to queries and turns work around promptly and to a high standard.’
‘I have always found the clerks and staff to be highly professional, and efficient. The standard of service provided has been exemplary, with prompt responses to enquiries, clear communication regarding counsel’s availability and fees structure. Instructions are always handled with due care and attention. In my professional dealings, I have found the chambers to uphold the highest standards of conduct, and their reputation for excellence in advocacy and client service is well deserved.’
Principaux dossiers
No5 Barristers' Chambers
No5 Barristers’ Chambers has developed ‘an excellent reputation in immigration law’, with members regularly acting in high-profile cases before the immigration tribunals, all levels of the English and Welsh Courts, as well as the European Court of Human Rights. Benjamin Hawkin led Jessica Smeaton in Celik v SSHD, the lead case on the Home Office’s interpretation of Articles 10 and 18 of the Withdrawal Agreement. Manjit Singh Gill KC was instructed in the landmark Rwanda litigation while Ranjiv Khubber acted in Castro v SSHD, a case concerning the deportation of an EU national and the refusal of both his human rights claim and his claim under the EU Settlement Scheme.
Les références
‘No5 Chambers has an excellent reputation in immigration law.’
‘Excellent immigration group with outstanding immigration practitioners and excellent and knowledgeable clerking.’
Principaux dossiers
Garden Court Chambers
Les références
The clerking team at Garden Court is excellent. In particular, Lisa O’Leary stands out as consistently helpful, efficient, and accommodating. She ensures a smooth administrative experience and is always available to assist.
The clerks are excellent, Helen Louise D\’Agostino and Harriet Massie are particularly responsive and always able to assist.
‘The clerks at Garden Court are some of the most efficient and friendliest clerks I have had the pleasure of dealing with over the years.’
Principaux dossiers
39 Essex Chambers
The ‘strong multi-disciplinary’ team at 39 Essex Chambers is distinguished for its robust immigrations appeals and judicial review practice, with the set representing both claimants and the Home Office in ‘some of the leading cases’ before all levels of the courts. The highly regarded Lisa Giovannetti KC is noted for acting on behalf of the government in immigration test cases, with recent cases involving the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy, family reunion policy for refugee children and the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. Rory Dunlop KC successfully represented the Home Office in AM (Belarus) v SSHD before the Supreme Court, setting a new precedent regarding whether there may be a positive obligation under Article 8 ECHR to give lawful status to an illegal immigrant who has obstructed removal. Colin Thomann KC centres his practice upon new country guidance determinations and policy challenges, while Alan Payne KC recently acted for the Home Office defeating a challenge to Home Office policy on the allocation of accommodation to vulnerable asylum seekers.
Les références
‘Very experienced and knowledgeable in immigration.’
’39 Essex Chambers is a powerhouse in immigration.’
‘Clear, persuasive and strategic.’
Principaux dossiers
Blackstone Chambers
Praised as ‘the premier public law set’ for many, the immigration barristers at Blackstone Chambers continue to be involved in high-profile cases spanning public law, human rights and immigration law. Naina Patel KC has recently acted on behalf of Anti-Slavery International concerning the Home Office's imposition of Public Order Disqualification decisions on victims of trafficking with criminal convictions, while 2025 silk appointment Jason Pobjoy KC has a track record of refugee law work and academia including the Rwanda plan litigation.
Les références
‘Good organisation with responsive clerks.’
‘A user-friendly set that is willing to make things work.’
‘Blackstone are the premier public law set.’
Principaux dossiers
Doughty Street Chambers
Considered ‘leaders in the field of immigration and asylum law’, the barristers at Doughty Street Chambers are well-respected for their wide-ranging expertise in immigration, nationality, and asylum matters. The set routinely acts on behalf of individual claimants and NGOs including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), at all levels of the courts. Laura Dubinsky KC, supported by Agata Patyna and Alice Irving, led the UNHCR team in R (YXY) v SSHD, the second round of Rwanda litigation following the introduction of the Safety of Rwanda Act 2024. At present, Dubinsky, Patyna and Sarah Dobbie are representing 94 asylum seekers in civil claims for damages for false imprisonment following their detention at Manston House. David Lemer is noted for his expertise in national security cases before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, while Simon Cox is involved in significant test case challenges under the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement, including a judicial review concerning the rights of carers of British citizen children in relation to the EU Settlement Scheme.
Les références
‘Very approachable and helpful clerking team.’
‘I’ve only ever had positive experiences with Doughty Street Chambers. Their clerks are always really helpful and well-organised and their barristers are always well informed and hard working.’
‘The team have great expertise covering all areas of asylum, immigration and nationality law. They are one of the leading sets in this field. Their clerks are very responsive and proactive.’
Principaux dossiers
Landmark Chambers
Landmark Chambers ‘stands out for its depth of expertise in all aspects of public law’, with its immigration barristers acting on behalf of both the government and claimants at the tribunal, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court level. David Blundell KC recently acted on behalf of the Secretary of State in Begum v SSHD, a high-profile case concerning the relationship between national security and procedural fairness whereby the Court of Appeal ultimately dismissed the appeal of the 25-year old who left Bethnal Green to join Islamic State in Syria a decade ago. Julia Smyth KC, who was appointed King’s Counsel in 2025, has led on several prominent cases involving provisions within the Withdrawal Agreement, while Alex Goodman KC led the successful appeal in ASY and Others v SSHD, a case concerning damages for breaches of Article 3 ECHR for migrant mothers whose children were denied recourse to public funds. Tim Buley KC continues to act as lead Special Advocate in a number of cases under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy.
Les références
‘One of the best immigration chambers in the country.’
‘Landmark are a top set for public law and human rights which includes much immigration related litigation. They have a great stable of barristers and their clerking is extremely user friendly.’
‘Clear, knowledgeable, personable and well structured.’
Principaux dossiers
Matrix Chambers
Matrix Chambers has earned a ‘very good reputation’ in the field of immigration and asylum law, with its practitioners regularly acting in complex and novel cases involving high net worth individuals and national security issues. Nick Armstrong KC led Toby Fisher and Darryl Hutcheon in R (AH and IS) v SSHD, a significant challenge to individual immigration detentions that raised a wider systems challenge to the Home Office and Brook House immigration removal centre. Raza Husain KC is highly regarded for his work on the Rwanda litigation, having acted as lead counsel the litigation both prior and subsequent to the Safety of Rwanda Act 2024, up until the policy's demise at the end of the Conservative government. Christopher Buttler KC acted in VT v Commissioner for the British Indian Ocean Territory, a successful claim on behalf of 61 Tamil migrants seeking damages for their treatment in the British Overseas Territory with no population other than a joint US-UK military base. Eleanor Mitchell was also involved in key Diego Garcia-related litigation.
Les références
‘Matrix are really good. They, rightly, have a very good reputation and are very well known in our field.’
Principaux dossiers
One Pump Court
With ‘very experienced counsel at all levels able to cover every area of immigration law’, One Pump Court is particularly adept at handling cases involving gender-based persecution, trafficking, immigration detention and asylum claims based on sexual orientation and gender identity. David Chirico KC acted in SSHD v Kolicaj before the Court of Appeal, successfully representing an Albanian-British dual national following a Home Office decision to deprive him of his citizenship, whereby the court concluded that the Home Office’s approach was procedurally unfair. Emma Daykin is highlighted for her work in numerous cases involving the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy, including high-profile claims involving former members of the Afghan Special Forces units known as the ‘Triples’, whose applications for relocation were allegedly vetoed by the SAS. Other key practitioners in the set are Justine Fisher and Daniel Grutters, who both leverage extensive experience in immigration detention cases.
Les références
‘They have very experienced counsel at all levels able to cover every area of immigration law. I feel confident of instructing any barrister at these chambers.’
‘Easy to work with and collaborative.’
Principaux dossiers
Goldsmith Chambers
‘Known to be experts in the field of immigration, asylum and human rights’, the immigration barristers at Goldsmith Chambers represent clients in immigration law matters before all levels of the Courts and Tribunal system. The set has a robust reputation for cases concerning the Withdrawal Agreement, with Anthony Metzer KC leading Sanaz Saifolahi in GH v SSHD, a successful appeal whereby the Court of Appeal found passport stamps amounted to facilitation of residence for the purposes of the Agreement. Saifolahi also has experience in national security cases before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, while Charlotte Bayati is highly regarded for her work on gender and sexual violence issues.
Les références
‘The team are known to be experts in the field of immigration, asylum, and human rights, with a crossing into other areas of law.’
‘Very quick to respond to queries and turns work around promptly and to a high standard.’
‘I have always found the clerks and staff to be highly professional, and efficient. The standard of service provided has been exemplary, with prompt responses to enquiries, clear communication regarding counsel’s availability and fees structure. Instructions are always handled with due care and attention. In my professional dealings, I have found the chambers to uphold the highest standards of conduct, and their reputation for excellence in advocacy and client service is well deserved.’
Principaux dossiers
No5 Barristers' Chambers
No5 Barristers’ Chambers has developed ‘an excellent reputation in immigration law’, with members regularly acting in high-profile cases before the immigration tribunals, all levels of the English and Welsh Courts, as well as the European Court of Human Rights. Benjamin Hawkin led Jessica Smeaton in Celik v SSHD, the lead case on the Home Office’s interpretation of Articles 10 and 18 of the Withdrawal Agreement. Manjit Singh Gill KC was instructed in the landmark Rwanda litigation while Ranjiv Khubber acted in Castro v SSHD, a case concerning the deportation of an EU national and the refusal of both his human rights claim and his claim under the EU Settlement Scheme.
Les références
‘No5 Chambers has an excellent reputation in immigration law.’
‘Excellent immigration group with outstanding immigration practitioners and excellent and knowledgeable clerking.’